Why was the Big Green Gathering Cancelled?

There are may be two broad reasons that the Big Green Gathering has been cancelled this year: 1) organisational disharmony, and [if there was, it pales beside] 2) the overt political agenda of the event meant there was little will in the police or the council to facilitate a solution.
 
In a climate of reduced tolerance of dissent, an event that presents alternative polities to those currently dominant is not going to be warmly embraced by the adherents to the dominant order.
 
For evidence of 1) read the forums here:
http://www.efestivals.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=118860&st=20
 
And, the Corporate Watch report here:
http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/?lid=3398
 
I have no direct evidence for 2). It is speculation based on the trends in policing dissent which we have seen recently; see:
 
* Kumi Naidoo in Open Democracy, http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/kumi-naidoo/2009/07/18/the-marginalisation-of-dissent
 
* Guy Atcheson's open letter to the BBC: http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/guy-aitchison/2009/05/21/an-open-letter-to-the-bbc
 
* Beth McGrath in the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/apr/02/g20-protest-climate-camp
 
... and the policing of last year's climate camp at Kingsnorth, the preemptive raid on protesters in Nottingham this April: the list grows longer.
 
The Big Green Gathering was political, even to some extent party political, although the Green Party distances itself from the deeper green activism that may also be present at the BGG. The BGG is - or was - not just a consumerist piss-up in a field where the waving of mobile phones has come to replace the obligatory disposable lighters. It is a question posed to our world.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (3)
Posted 4 months ago

The Equality Trust

We believe that in order to gain substantial improvements in the real quality of life of the populations of developed countries it is necessary that differences in income and wealth are greatly reduced.

OK, so we joke about how we have the randiest teenage liggers in Europe, can out-belch the Belgians and who would want perfect teef anyway? But inequality in society makes life worse for all, and - as you would expect - those on the lower end of the scale get a disproportionately worse deal than those at the top. The Thatcherite monetarist nostrum that, "... a rising tide floats all the boats..." is not true. To keep the metaphor, there is now very good evidence in Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, The Spirit Level (Penguin 2009), that lower tides and longer mooring lines are what we need.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  democracy   education   equality   politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 4 months ago